By Gavin Aleogho
You are the salt
of the earth; but if the salt loses its flavor, how shall it be seasoned? It is
then good for nothing but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by men. Matthew 5:13.
Lately,
this question has been on my mind, “why didn’t Jesus refer to His followers as
the sugar of the earth but rather, as the salt of the earth, considering that
sugar is sweeter than salt?” My quest led me to search on the many advantages
of salt as against the disadvantages of sugar. This findings made it clear to
me why Jesus preferred using the word salt rather than sugar to describe the
saints.
On
casual inspection, salt and sugar appear almost identical. Both are white in
colour. They are crystalline solids. Although, both are water soluble, but they
have vast chemical differences. They share no elemental components at all.
The
difference between salt and sugar is mainly in their elemental and chemical composition
and the bonding that holds this element together and the way they dissolve in
water. I will actually not want to go into much scientific comparison.
Why Jesus said we are the salt of the earth and not
the sugar of the earth?
1.
Salt
preserves but Sugar is an agents of decay. Salt purify and preserve from
corruption. Thus, we are supposed to be agent of preservation of godly virtues and
values and not agents of decay of moral values in our society.
Is your life or
your ministry aiming at preserving godly virtues?
2.
Salt
is used to fight agents of decay and corruption, but sugar is never used for
that. Just like sugar is accepted by majority, you can’t use what people want
to hear to heal them or change them. If you are salt, your message should be
used to fight decay and corruption in people’s life for the preservation of
their souls.
Is your life and
ministry pampering the sin of people or is it fighting the decay and corruption
that is eating our society?
3.
Salt
has maximum nutritional value compared to sugar. Temporarily, sugar might taste
good and accepted by all, but to have a longtime effect, salt is preferred. We
must aim at giving to our world, things that gives longtime value not short
term value. Not giving temporal pleasure for eternal destruction.
Does your
message has enough substance to preserve souls for eternity?
4.
Sugar
invites and accommodates agents of decay, but salt does not. We should be
people whose life and ministry repels agents of decay and destruction. If our life
is conducive for agent of decay, then our salvation is questionable. When
darkness is comfortable in the presence of light, then the light ceases to be
light.
Is your
lifestyle repelling evil or is your ministry raising men whose lives repel
evil?
5.
Sugar
only garnishes the surface, but salt interact with the content it is applied
to. Sugar only makes good on the outside but it is not able to confront the
decay in the heart of men. But salt makes good and also confront and heal decay
and corruption from the inside-out.
Is your ministry
having a strong effect in the heart and souls of men or is it just garnishing
the surface of men?
6.
Salt
brings healing to wounds, but sugar worsens it. Application of salt to a wound
kills germs, although it stings so badly. But sugar does not brings healing, rather
it attracts organisms of decay that might further worsen the situation.
Is our message
bringing healing or worsening the spiritual conditions of people?
Jesus
calls Christians to be salt, not sugar, but sadly many Christians and even some
ministers of the gospel have preferred to be sugar of the earth. They only give
to the society what it wants not what will change and impact the society
positively. Salt doesn’t just give flavour, it also preserves. Does your
Christianity or ministry only brings flavour to the table without preserving
the lives of people for eternity?
The
usefulness of salt is in when it is applied. It is not useful when it is only
contained in its container. You must make contact with your world in other to
impact it. To bring healing to our decaying world, we need to apply the
saltiness in our lives.
Good article that can help Christians to be Christians!
ReplyDeleteI am thankful to Gavin for this attractive lesson. I do have a question: Was there sugar during Jesus was teaching gospel on earth? Please, I need your answer and you can contact me on my email address: elias.tesfaye70@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteSugar as we know it today – table sugar from sugarcane or sugar beets – is never directly mentioned in the Bible.
DeleteThe closest references are to “honey” or “sweet cane.”
For example, Isaiah 43:24 (NKJV) says: "You have bought Me no sweet cane with money, Nor have you satisfied Me with the fat of your sacrifices; But you have burdened Me with your sins, You have wearied Me with your iniquities."
Sweet cane MAY refer to sugar products, but could also mean sweet sorghum or fruit juices that were concentrated into sweet syrups.
But to respond to your question directly, "Was there sugar when Jesus was teaching the gospel on earth?"
ANSWER:
There is no single verse that suggest that there was something like sugar, neither is there any verse that suggest it wasn't there.
Technically speaking , from the New Testament account, we can deduce that they (Israelites) had something like a sweater which is synonymous with the sugar of our days.
I hope I helped you?
Blessings.
Pst. Gavin Aleogho